Hello Everyone,
I want to make this post to encourage some reflection within the community. As we know, Metalswap offers Hedging Contracts as its product, which can be easily implemented with new assets by creating specific pools and with fairly quick modifications to the website.
Thus, it makes a lot of sense to imagine new use cases that bring volumes to our product and consequently generate interest and an appreciation process for the token through the buyback mechanism.
Recently in DeFi, there has been a lot of talk about the Ethena Protocol which introduced a USD stablecoin, USDe, with an interesting concept. This stablecoin is backed by Liquid Staked Tokens (LST), so to generate USDe, one must lock LSTs like stETH and many other such tokens.
USDe can be locked to generate sUSDe, which is a token with a variable APY, but since its release, the project has shown very high rates, fluctuating between 20% and 40%.
How is this gain possible?
Ethena’s strategy is to hold a portion of the stETH that people lock to generate the stablecoin and to go short on a pair like ETH/USD on a perpetual to hedge against this ETH. Thus, the gain is justified under two aspects:
- Earning the % inherent in staking stETH.
- Earning the Funding Rate from short operations.
What are the risks involved?
Mainly related to a market scenario where ETH prices are falling, and we imagine that the Funding Rate is negative, i.e., the shorts have to pay the longs. In this case, the USDe stablecoin peg could have problems, potentially leading to dangerous bank run phenomena for the ecosystem. Ethena has established an Insurance Fund for these scenarios.
What would be the advantages of implementing a token like sUSDe in Hedging Contracts?
Mainly related to Liquidity Providers who, instead of depositing a stable, could deposit sUSDe and earn XMT as liquidity rewards, finding a stable with an APY given by Ethena’s operation. If we think about Hedging Contracts on a pair like ETH - sUSDe, we can say that for operations with short timeframes, sUSDe would behave like a normal stablecoin, and for longer timeframes, we can say that one earns less with long operations if ETH appreciates, and a bit more from short operations if ETH depreciates, due to the operation of sUSDe.
So, for a potential operation to include sUSDe as a pool in our system, I would try to delve into some issues:
- Opportunities for visibility thanks to this operation.
- Explore the risks of the Ethena system.
- Check if the sUSDe oracle is on the Optimism or Linea chain.
- Study some creative use cases that could serve Ethena users.
What do you think?